Psalms:
Bk 1: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41
Bk 2: 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 67 68 69 70 71 72
Bk 3: 73 74 75 76 77 78 79 80 81 82 83 84 85 86 87 88 89
Bk 4: 90 91 92 93 94 95 96 97 98 99 100 101 102 103 104 105 106
Bk 5: 107 108 109 110 111 112 113 114 115 116 117 118 119a 119b 120 121 122 123 124 125 126 127 128 129 130 131 132
133 134 135 136 137 138 139 140 141 142 143 144 145 146 147 148 149 150
Additional Psalms: 151 152 153 154 155 156 157 158 159 160 Samuel Chronicles
52:1 LA MENATSE'ACH MASKIL LE DAVID
KJ (King James translation): A Psalm of David, when Doeg the Edomite came and told Saul, and said unto him, David is come to the house of Ahimelech.) Why boastest thou thyself in mischief, O mighty man? the goodness of God endureth continually.
BN (BibleNet translation): For the Leader. A Maskil for David.
MASKIL: A "teaching-Psalm".
LA MENATSE'ACH: See my note at Psalm 51.
52:2 BE VO DO'EG HA EDOMI VA YAGED LE SHA'UL VA YOMER LO BA DAVID EL BEIT ACHI-MELECH
KJ: as above
BN: When Do'eg the Edomite came and told Sha'ul, {N} saying to him: "David has been at Achi-Melech's shrine."
At Nov, to be precise, which was one the collection of hillside shrines and villages that David would later incorporate into the single city of Yeru-Shala'im. David fled here (1 Samuel 21) after yet another attempt on his life by the king; when Sha'ul learned that the priests of Nov had sheltered him, he then decimated it to the last priest but one, the lone survivor being Avi-Atar ben Achi-Melech, who David would later appoint as his joint Chief Priest with Tsadok.
Once again we have to ask: is this history, and we have a record of the poem that David wrote after the incident; or is it history written at some later date, and attributed to David (if it is, then it has been sloppy with its proof-reading, because David had long left Nov before Do'eg informed Sha'ul, so "is come" or "has come" are errors); or is it mythology, and we need to read the semiotics? If the latter, then it is part of the "Labours of Herakles" in its proto-Jewish version, and may have been used as the equivalent of a "Miracle" or "Mystery" play of the Christian Middle Ages, or as the legends of Orestes, Electra, etc were performed in the Dionysus festivals in Greece.
52:3 MAH TIT'HALEL BE RA'AH HA GIBOR CHESED EL KOL HA YOM
KJ: as above
BN: Why do you boast about this vast wickedness? The mercy of El is constant.
EL: Surprised to find the deity here EL? Does it change radically our understanding of the Davidic tales, requiring us to set them among the Beney Kena'an long before they were adopted by the Beney Yisra-El? It should do.
52:4 HAVOT TACHSHOV LESHONECHA KE TA'AR MELUTASH OSEH REMIYAH
KJ (52:2): Thy tongue deviseth mischiefs; like a sharp razor, working deceitfully.
BN: Your tongue thinks of destruction; like a sharp razor, working deceitfully.
52:5 AHAVTA RA MI TOV SHEKER MIDABER TSEDEK (SELAH)
KJ (52:3): Thou lovest evil more than good; and lying rather than to speak righteousness. Selah.
BN: You love evil more than good, falsehoods more than speaking righteously. (Selah)
52:6 AHAVTA CHOL DIVREY VAL'A LESHON MIRMAH
KJ (52:4): Thou lovest all devouring words, O thou deceitful tongue.
BN: You love all-devouring words, the deceitful tongue.
DIVREY VAL'A: The root really means "to swallow", so clearly this must be an idiom; but meaning what exactly? We talk about people "swallowing their words", but it probably isn't that. Does it mean "gossip" and "scandalous rumour" - the kinds of rumours that get people's reputations "swallowed up", even their lives "devoured". Had David not fled as soon as he knew he might have been seen by Do'eg, he would have been "devoured" by the following afternoon - 1 Samuel 21 for the full tale, verse 8 for Do'eg, verse 9 for David's flight - to Achish of Gat which is the other option for Psalm 34. 1 Samuel 22:6 ff for Do'eg telling Sha'ul and the massacre that follows.
52:7 GAM EL YITATSCHA LA NETSACH YACHTECHA VE YISACHACHA ME OHEL VE SHERESHCHA ME ERETS CHAYIM (SELAH)
KJ (52:5): God shall likewise destroy thee for ever, he shall take thee away, and pluck thee out of thy dwelling place, and root thee out of the land of the living. Selah.
BN: El will likewise break you for ever, {N} He will take you up, and pluck you out of your tent, and root you out of the land of the living. (Selah)
Really this is just a hate-poem, a venting of deep fury against both Do'eg and Sha'ul, but the final verse will Psalmify it, or at least justify its inclusion among the Psalms.
52:8 VE YIR'U TSADIYKIM VE YIYRA'U VE ALAV YISCHAKU
KJ (52:6): The righteous also shall see, and fear, and shall laugh at him:
BN: The righteous also shall see, and fear, and treat you derisorily.
The English cannot convey the play between YIR'U and YIRA'U.
YISCHAKU: This is not YITSCHAKU, though, as we have seen many times, there are issues as to whether Av-Raham and Sarah's son was named Yischak or Yitschak; but that is not the word-play here. The root, SACHAK, is used for "play", whether as sport (Zechariah 8:5), or frollicking (Job 40:20), or music (1 Samuel 18:7). Worth looking at Judges 16:25 as well, because it has both SACHAK and TSACHAK, but also because the intention in our verse is also the intention there: mockery.
52:9 HINEH HA GEVER LO YASIM ELOHIM MA'UZO VA YIVTACH BE ROV ASHRO YA'OZ BE HAVATO
KJ (52:7): Lo, this is the man that made not God his strength; but trusted in the abundance of his riches, and strengthened himself in his wickedness.
BN: Behold the man who the gods have not made their stronghold, {N} but trusting in the abundance of his riches, he has strengthened himself through his wickedness.
GEVER: from the same root that gives GIBOR, for which see its very precise use in verse 3. Perhaps more significantly, we normally have ISH or ADAM as the word for "man". GEVER has a rather more colloquial tone to it - "bloke" rather than "chap", but of that order.
52:10 VA ANI KE ZAYIT RA'ANAN BE VEIT ELOHIM BATACHTI VE CHESED ELOHIM OLAM VA ED
KJ (52:8): But I am like a green olive tree in the house of God: I trust in the mercy of God for ever and ever.
BN: But as for me, I am like a leafy olive-tree in the house of God; {N} I will trust in the mercy of the gods for ever and ever.
RA'ANAN: "green" or "leafy"; it can't be both, because they are opposites - "green" means a sapling, young, naive, not yet producing leaves let alone fruit; "leafy" is full-grown, fertile, productive, "blessed" by the gods. But can we also assume the opposite for the fruit, that these are black olives, rather than green ones, and for the same reason (click here)?
ELOHIM: Need to run a check across all the Psalms, and note which ones are Elohim, which YHVH, and which both. I think this makes two in a row in which YHVH has not even achieved a passing mention.
52:11 ODECHA LE OLAM KI ASIYTA VA AKAVEH SHIMCHA CHI TOV NEGED CHASIDEYCHA
KJ (52:9): I will praise thee for ever, because thou hast done it: and I will wait on thy name; for it is good before thy saints.
BN: I will give thanks to you for ever, because of what you have done; and I will wait for Thy name, for it is good, in the presence of Thy saints. {P}
Psalms:
Bk 1: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41
Bk 2: 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 67 68 69 70 71 72
Bk 3: 73 74 75 76 77 78 79 80 81 82 83 84 85 86 87 88 89
Bk 4: 90 91 92 93 94 95 96 97 98 99 100 101 102 103 104 105 106
Bk 5: 107 108 109 110 111 112 113 114 115 116 117 118 119a 119b 120 121 122 123 124 125 126 127 128 129 130 131 132
133 134 135 136 137 138 139 140 141 142 143 144 145 146 147 148 149 150
Additional Psalms: 151 152 153 154 155 156 157 158 159 160 Samuel Chronicles
No comments:
Post a Comment